only--dreams.fotkoblog.pl

dobra czapa :D

dgaf: dobra czapa :D

łaadnie ;)

sysia: łaadnie ;)

śliczna ;3

kryzysowanarzeczona: śliczna ;3

Ooo, jaka ładna. < 3

miss-nothing: Ooo, jaka ładna. < 3

czapa fajna ;D

tarantula: czapa fajna ;D

Very interesting topic, and deietfnily not any of the ideas I had floating around as to what it might be. You raise some interesting points about the harm that can be caused from divorce. I have never been divorced, and my parents are still married (38 years,my maternal grandparents divorced when my mom was very young, so that's what I'm bringing to the table as far as family experience goes. I don't think divorce should be banned, and I don't think that making it harder to obtain one is a good idea. Most religions state that divorce is a sin (it seems that the degree of sin differs from religion to religion) and you quote scripture to back that up. But what about those of us who do not believe in the bible, who are atheist, agnostic, or have other reasons for not accepting the bible as an authority?Then marriage becomes a contract, or a promise, not a divinely sanctioned institution. It becomes something entered into by two consenting adults; the ending of which becomes a legal matter, to be handled in court. The court system is already burdened enough without having to drag out the process of divorce, and it's not there for the purpose of determining which marriages might be savable. It is simply there for the "stuff" side; to determine the terms of the end of the partnership, and in some cases to protect one party from abuse, etc.As far as the point you raise about no fault divorces; they aren't always what they seem to be. They are often the cheapest, quickest route to getting a divorce, and can sometimes be used when one party is afraid of the other. I had a very good friend who was divorced on the grounds of being separated for one year (that state's version of no fault). Her husband was very physically abusive, but because he was in law enforcement and she didn't want him to lose his job she chose to divorce him on the basis of a one year separation. I don't think she should have been required to stay with him, or had a harder time divorcing him. She could easily be dead right now had that happened. Now, I do believe in marriage, and I do believe it should last forever. After all, you are vowing to spend your life with someone. BUT, a lot of things should be one way, but are quite another. You can't just say that just because something SHOULD be one way that we have the right to MAKE it that way for everyone. No one outside of a marriage can really know what that marriage is like. Things look a lot different from the outside looking in, and only the two people involved know the full story, so I think they are the only two people truly in a position to know if their marriage can be saved or needs to end.Also, not to get off topic, but I just don't think you can blame divorce for violent acts. You always hear that roughly half of all marriages end in divorce, but you don't hear about roughly half of the population going on shooting rampages. Eventually we all have to take some responsibility for our actions.

Gość: Very interesting topic, and deietfnily not any of the ideas I had floating around as to what it might be. You raise some interesting points about the harm that can be caused from divorce. I have never been divorced, and my parents are still married (38 years,my maternal grandparents divorced when my mom was very young, so that's what I'm bringing to the table as far as family experience goes. I don't think divorce should be banned, and I don't think that making it harder to obtain one is a good idea. Most religions state that divorce is a sin (it seems that the degree of sin differs from religion to religion) and you quote scripture to back that up. But what about those of us who do not believe in the bible, who are atheist, agnostic, or have other reasons for not accepting the bible as an authority?Then marriage becomes a contract, or a promise, not a divinely sanctioned institution. It becomes something entered into by two consenting adults; the ending of which becomes a legal matter, to be handled in court. The court system is already burdened enough without having to drag out the process of divorce, and it's not there for the purpose of determining which marriages might be savable. It is simply there for the "stuff" side; to determine the terms of the end of the partnership, and in some cases to protect one party from abuse, etc.As far as the point you raise about no fault divorces; they aren't always what they seem to be. They are often the cheapest, quickest route to getting a divorce, and can sometimes be used when one party is afraid of the other. I had a very good friend who was divorced on the grounds of being separated for one year (that state's version of no fault). Her husband was very physically abusive, but because he was in law enforcement and she didn't want him to lose his job she chose to divorce him on the basis of a one year separation. I don't think she should have been required to stay with him, or had a harder time divorcing him. She could easily be dead right now had that happened. Now, I do believe in marriage, and I do believe it should last forever. After all, you are vowing to spend your life with someone. BUT, a lot of things should be one way, but are quite another. You can't just say that just because something SHOULD be one way that we have the right to MAKE it that way for everyone. No one outside of a marriage can really know what that marriage is like. Things look a lot different from the outside looking in, and only the two people involved know the full story, so I think they are the only two people truly in a position to know if their marriage can be saved or needs to end.Also, not to get off topic, but I just don't think you can blame divorce for violent acts. You always hear that roughly half of all marriages end in divorce, but you don't hear about roughly half of the population going on shooting rampages. Eventually we all have to take some responsibility for our actions.